Do you think that new bespoke audio system will be able to fit the mr-s. i think it has the same dimensions as the fr-s audio system.
http://www.scion.com/BeSpoke/
http://www.scion.com/BeSpoke/
with the 2001 I went with the Scion because I needed the MP3 functionality! Lyle Lovett has about 150 recordings, and I would need 10 cd's for that many songs! :huh:I never seemed to understand the fascination for replacing the head unit with a Scion one.
.
I'm convinced that coherent thought has become a learned skill.Does anyone start posts in the correct sub forums anymore?
It has more of a factory look I guess ... not too *flashy*. I suppose Scion owners are trying to get rid of their anyways.I never seemed to understand the fascination for replacing the head unit with a Scion one.
Dev, are you still rocking that single DIN Eclipse? I didn't see a picture of it installed, only dry-humping another singe DIN unit. :lol: What have you got in right now, and do you have any pics? I looked around a bit, but MAN... you have a lot of posts to sift through....I never seemed to understand the fascination for replacing the head unit with a Scion one.
I have actually gone though three different Eclipse head units. The current one that I have was purchased in 2007 and I am not exactly satisfied with the cheap Chinese build quality but it had the pro tuning features I needed for the three way active set up. The one I had before which was made in Japan was of higher quality but did not have any kind of usb provisions.Dev, are you still rocking that single DIN Eclipse? I didn't see a picture of it installed, only dry-humping another singe DIN unit. :lol: What have you got in right now, and do you have any pics? I looked around a bit, but MAN... you have a lot of posts to sift through.
I just put a middle-road Pioneer into my girlfriend's mazda, and I'm pretty impressed for the money.I have actually gone though three different Eclipse head units. The current one that I have was purchased in 2007 and I am not exactly satisfied with the cheap Chinese build quality but it had the pro tuning features I needed for the three way active set up. The one I had before which was made in Japan was of higher quality but did not have any kind of usb provisions.
Most of the car audio head units out there today is crap but If I had to choose I would say Pioneer is probably the one to get.
Many times a middle of the road anything makes great value as long as the overpriced flagship is of good quality.I just put a middle-road Pioneer into my girlfriend's mazda, and I'm pretty impressed for the money.
It always has been. Learned implies taught, and the few that have this skill, and are therefore capable of teaching it, apply coherent thought and decide against going into teaching. Parents don't teach it to their kids, they expect the teachers to do that.I'm convinced that coherent thought has become a learned skill.
Some people listen to MP3's. Some people eat at McDonald's.With a tone deaf public it works out quiet well because they will never know the difference as long as their ipods connect to it.
Thread moved to audio forum.Does anyone start posts in the correct sub forums anymore?
I would like to think all people like what's best and sincerely believe they do but their choices are a result of coercion.Some people listen to MP3's. Some people eat at McDonald's.
To each his own, but I'll never understand either practice. Life has few enough pleasures and more than enough vexations already.
Apple? Do you mean Apple?I would like to think all people like what's best and sincerely believe they do but their choices are a result of coercion.
I think it's perfectly ok that people have the freedom of choice to make bad decisions and I wouldn't stand in the way of a company to be deceptive with their advertising because I believe if you have a good product it will sell it's self. What I have a problem with is protective agencies which regulate definitions, standardization and cover ups to hurt competitors to the point where good choices are eliminated or they adopt a philosophy of if you cant beat them then join them.
I don't have a problem with Apple even though I rarely use their stuff. I think they are for the most part an example of innovation and good marketing. I never liked their stuff because they do trap you into their world however people have the choice not to buy Apple or get stuck with I tunes.Apple? Do you mean Apple?
Interesting. Trying to puzzle out how what I said triggered this response. The brain must be taking the day off today.I would like to think all people like what's best and sincerely believe they do but their choices are a result of coercion.
I think it's perfectly ok that people have the freedom of choice to make bad decisions and I wouldn't stand in the way of a company to be deceptive with their advertising because I believe if you have a good product it will sell it's self. What I have a problem with is protective agencies which regulate definitions, standardization and cover ups to hurt competitors to the point where good choices are eliminated or they adopt a philosophy of if you cant beat them then join them.
I dunno. I think apple is a great marketing company. I used to program apps for iOS, but apple is such a brutal and manipulative company that I decided to focus my efforts elsewhere. Between their license agreements, their patent warfare, the way they treat their employees (and not just in china), and their software packaging methods (Anyone who has iTunes has safari, even though they don't realize it), I believe that what little market share they hold is due to well-concealed manipulation of the end user.I don't have a problem with Apple even though I rarely use their stuff. I think they are for the most part an example of innovation and good marketing. I never liked their stuff because they do trap you into their world however people have the choice not to buy Apple or get stuck with I tunes.
I do not think they purposely tried to hurt their competition that's probably because they have a product that sells it's self.