On the other hand, the more you retard the spark the hotter the exhaust gets, unless you go richer in fuel/air.
On the other hand, the more you retard the spark the hotter the exhaust gets, unless you go richer in fuel/air.You're not wrong. I run timing on the VERY conservative side and stay well away from any knock. I probably leave 30 HP on the table just to protect the engine.
300 hp is way on the low side of what the unopened 2ZZ engine can do. 300 crank is only like 8 PSI on most builds and maybe even less. You can do that without an intercooler! Heck, you can even manage that supercharged with no intercooler (see Lotus TVS builds). I have done that with my 71mm turbo even without active knock control from the ECU.
There is a direct relationship between spark timing and exhaust temp. As you retard from MBT (Minimum spark advance for Best Torque) at a fixed speed and load, exhaust temp goes up. This is basic engine science.That's not exactly the case. I can make no more power at 10.5:1 than 11.5:1 with more timing in most of the map.
I go back to my point I was making earlier though. A 500HP 2ZZ does not make a whole lot of sense if you are running a C-series transaxle. Seriously, look at what the power to weight would be (if the transaxle didn't explode). That is an insane car. Trust me. IMO it is not worth building the 2ZZ for that kind of power.
Power/Weight LBS
Cayman GTS 4.0 = 0.123
FAT Spyder 2200lbs @ 500 HP = 0.23
Huracan = 0.188
Right, but it can reduce knock tendency all the way to almost the smoke point.Yes, but my point is that adding fuel does not actually help protect the engine beyond a point.